From New York to London - The Path of Deceit
As a Muslim, one must profess the truth of the Unity of God at all costs. Even if the whole world were to reject Allah’s existence, the existence of a life after death and the Messengership of the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace and God’s blessings), the Muslim as a defender of the truth must stand high, at least in his heart, and believe what he knows to be truth and not be led away from it. Affairs of the world are similar to this: for example, the concept of justice. The Messenger of God (upon whom be peace and God’s blessings) taught us to stand up for justice no matter what the cost and no matter if anyone else stopped you or failed to accommodate a just and truthful course of action.
As a result I have a dilemma and though I am going out on a limb by saying this, the dilemma is this: I believe that the official version of the events that took place on the 7th July in London are a fabrication and a malicious distortion of what really took place that fateful morning. Unfortunately it hasn’t even been a week, the “investigation” is just over a week old and the majority of the country has already fallen hook, line and sinker for the government’s story. The thing that troubles me is that for us to proceed forward with the rest of the country we now have to buy into the official line if we are to be taken seriously by other communities. Maybe it’s déjà vu but this is exactly what happened right after 9/11 and I knew that if it ever happened again, for it would inevitably as we were constantly prepared thus by the fear-mongering and agenda-driven politicians, that the sequence of events would more or less follow what happened in the North Eastern United States in 2001.
Now I am no detective but when I start poking holes in the official version of events there seems to be no end to the holes I can poke. Why is it that all the newspapers, the day after it happened, had headlines splashed across their front pages saying more or less and word for word, “Al Qaeda Terror Hits London.” The only scrap of evidence to support this is a suspicious statement, translated with mistakes, by a ridiculously named and supposed affiliate of Al Qaeda. This on a website that is networked to a company in Maryland whose servers also host pornographic websites. I mean, if Al Qaeda is that sophisticated, organised as well as religious, you would think they would do a background trace of the server to see if it has any suspicious links (for example, it might be a CIA front) or, of course, questionable material? This resoundingly parallels to the account of the hijackers of 9/11 clubbing, drinking and copulating away a few nights before their “Shahadah (martyrdom).” If I can think of doing such a thing, I am sure they can as well. If you know web development and the Internet you know how easy it is to put up a fake website. However, it is just as feasible to dig up who uploaded this statement providing a lead as to whether other individuals or groups supported the bombers or not and if so by whom. Of course that is if the police are serious about catching the perpetrators of this crime, although if they were to honestly and rigorously follow up such leads the trail might end right back up at Vauxhall Cross. The immediate statements of the newspapers is deeply irresponsible and consequent to prior suggestions that any attack on London would without doubt be carried out by Muslims, immediately pointed the finger of blame at the Muslim community. When I was walking down Oxford Street in London on 9/11, just a few hours after the events took place there was a major newspaper being sold at the stands with the headline: “Arab Hijackers kill hundreds.” This does nothing other than feed into the already established stereotype in the West, meticulously executed throughout the past decade, that Arabs and Muslims are nothing other than bloodthirsty, violent murderers, terrorists and genocidal maniacs.
My dear readers, British Muslims have not had it good at all since 9/11; this is the last thing we needed. If I wrongly accused a High Court Judge of taking bribes without any credible evidence, he would be well within his right to sue me for slander, yet here we have a baseless claim by the national media. The media could, of course, cry foul and say, “we are just reporting news”, regardless of their appreciation of its ability to influence public opinion through sheer perception. The government are silent suggesting that really they are also of the same conclusion, again with no evidence. This can only mean that this country’s ruling elite who are the real “shareholders” of the media, the government and public institutions have an agenda to follow and for this agenda to be carried out, they need the public to believe that “Muslims did it.” You and I know that if there is one rotten apple in a basket, you are inclined to throw the whole basket away which means that now the Muslim community are in a very precarious situation.
The irresponsibility of the media is just one hole of this farce. Why hasn’t any police officer noted the fact that the four alleged bombers have not been placed at the scenes of the crimes in London? They have been pictured in Luton (which, I would like to add, is an hour and a half outside of London; nowhere near the capital!!!), but that’s it. The primary objective of any murder investigation (let’s not forget that this is essentially what this is: an elaborate murder of over 50 people) is to place the suspect or suspects at the scene of the crime. In this case, this has not been done; in fact the exact opposite is the case. Also, the grainy video close-up photo of one of the bombers is wholly inadequate to make a positive ID and does not have the same facial features as the original passport photo of that same individual that has been splashed across the world. Why is it that the government are not investigating the fact that a private consulting firm called Visor was running crisis management drills on behalf of the government at exactly the same times and places as the bombs went off according to an on-the-record interview that very same day by resident consultant Peter Power. Instead of sensibly investigating whether someone in the firm was using his position to plant and set off bombs (and if it was a Muslim, the I would be more than happy to believe it) the official line again is a wall of denial: “it was just a coincidence.” Why does an Israeli newspaper report it that Israel’s Finance Minister Benyamin Netanyahu was warned not to leave his hotel room near one of the bombsites prior to the bombs going off? Why is it that people are so scared of considering the possibility of government complicity when it has been determined without a shadow of a doubt that Western governments are prepared to harm their own citizens, and have done in the past, to further their objectives under the name of national security?
In one of the greatest scandals in Israeli history, whose intelligence agency’s (the Mossad) motto is “By deception thou shall do war,” the government was caught masterminding a false flag operation, recruiting Egyptian Jews to implicate and further stigmatise the Egyptians through murderous attacks on US and British targets. The Lavon Affair, being a matter of public record, dominated Israeli politics for a decade and led to the resignation of PM Ben Gurion. Many analysts believe that some of the Islamic militant groups of the Middle East have also been secretly financed by Israel to justify a perpetual clampdown on the Palestinians. Another example of government treachery is Operation Northwoods, again a matter of public knowledge, and the documents of which having been recently declassified under the US Freedom of Information Act. In 1962 with serious tensions between Cuba, the US Joints of Staff commissioned a report delivered to then Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara recommending military and intelligence agencies to stage terrorist attacks on the mainland United States and blame them on Fidel Castro as an excuse to invade Cuba.
Now to just discard this line of reasoning and certain truths that are blaring us in the face as “conspiracy theories” is, in my opinion, a human gut reaction of refusing to face something that is even more terrifying than the bombings themselves. Which is that people are being looked straight in the face by their own government and the media and being lied to. Strategies to justify a police state and greater state powers and authority to wage war have not changed since time immemorial. Adolf Hitler did precisely the same thing with the Reichstag Fire and the subsequent build-up of his police state and military empire: “The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one.” Common sense, logic and an evident history prevent me from having any reason to believe in and go along with most of what the neo-aristocracy’s instruments of government and media have to say. Muslims may have been involved in what happened in London and I am against narrow-mindedly refusing to consider that possibility; there are many of our brothers and sisters out there who actively propagate and practice ideas and activities that are outside the fold of Islam, some of them right here in Britain no doubt. However, as students of espionage history well know, it is standard operating procedure for an intelligence agency to plan an operation involving and recruiting people that have no idea who they are really working for.
False flag operations are a reality; they happen today as they have happened throughout history and as Matt Hutaff said last week, “The bombing of the London Underground was a false-flag operation designed to keep the West mired in war. Don’t believe otherwise.”