Reflections on the State of the World

October 25, 2004 C.E.

Welcome to Earth. Iraq has been illegally invaded by the consensus of not only the Muslim world but also most of the conscious international community; it has become a polluted, terrible and chaotic desert marred by, literally, spilt blood and spent shells. Not long before this invasion, the same thing happened to Afghanistan (although there was more international backing to that action due to the recent horrific attacks in the North Eastern United States that transpired after which no one dared to question the American response) and there is now open talk of adding Iran and possibly Syria to the list. Meanwhile, the misguided and discredited War on Terror is spawning more and more (mostly Muslim fanatics) instead of killing the phenomenon off and jovially fanning the flames of rage throughout the Muslim and Arab world thereon providing ample opportunity to advance the so-called Clash of Civilisations. How did we arrive at this state of affairs and how does this glitch fit into the timetable for the new world order? What we do know is this:

U.S. officials have officially reversed the premise of going to war from the eradication of Saddam’s imaginary weapons stockpiles to the eradication of his regime itself.
This war is illegal according to all systems of rules from the religious to the UN Charter, as per the recent statement of the UN Secretary-General. People from all walks of life from ex-Presidents, intellectuals, scientists, university professors, the clerk at the local supermarket, Ministers, Rabbis, Priests and Imams one and all have denounced this action as illegal and for the most part contrary to the spirit of international affairs. The prelude to the invasion in itself is proof of the US Government’s utter contempt for global recognition and endorsement. “You are either with us or you are with the terrorists” is the simple litmus test with which they brush the whole world with, even neutral Switzerland.
Gulf War II was pushed through by a neo-conservative cabal of policy makers in key positions throughout the Bush Administration and the Pentagon.
What the war has secured, though, is oil, further Israeli security and American geostrategic dominance.
The cabal propagates an openly unilateralist American approach to world issues (credit to the Project for the New American Century and the American Enterprise Institute) that sees the global dominance of America’s Political, Economic, Cultural and Military might as its top priority. According to its recommendations this new imperative could not be undertaken as forcefully as preferred until such time when there occurs a Pearl Harbour type of event, an event that will gather limitless support around its agenda concealed with the name of Global Security.
Things started rolling on the morning of September 11, 2001 when hijacked planes ploughed into the Financial and Military heartlands of America and the fields of Pennsylvania and the rest, as they say, is history.

The one thing that has made the whole world uneasy is that despite widespread concerns and probably the greatest outbreak of protests in recent political history against this action, which included several groups of Westerners who volunteered to act as human shields for Iraqis on the ground during the military assault, the President of the United States of America implicitly brushed these objections aside with hardly any sensitivity that befits a leader of the most powerful and influential nation in the world. Indeed the imperial and dominating behaviour of America who has been labelled by many as the “global bully” has underlined some serious concerns as to its future conduct in an increasingly unsafe world. Even Johnson’s Vietnam, despite the parallels that have been drawn with the current crisis, does not quite fit the category of conduct that is being carried out by his Presidential heir since even then, there was a loose multilateral consensus that Communism must not be able to dominate the Far East. With the Second Gulf War, the premise was a fabrication, objections were international in scope and the assault merciless. This is not an argument for the Vietnam War but distinctions do need to be made; indeed the logistical and military quandaries are quite similar and the same kind of atmosphere eventually enveloped Americans who proclaimed “Why are we there?”

The approval of the international community is the new yardstick for policy approval. The First Gulf War and the Balkans War of the last decade of the twentieth century were examples of successful (if that could be said, for now) diplomacy leading to international consensus and determination to confront a common enemy. In my last article I discussed to an extent of how many policy makers and strategists foresee the recognition of a global authority in the twenty-first century that would drive all policies and actions. This is clearly not the case with the current crisis: America is a power, but that power has not transformed into globally recognised authority which is partly the reason why the world has fragmented into many different opinion-camps due to the lack of strong international leadership. The United Nations lacks the military clout, Europe lacks unity on account of American infiltration, Russia has its own problems and China seems to be waiting things out to see what happens. Nevertheless, according to Brzezinski, global strategist and former National Security Advisor to President Carter in his book ‘Out of Control’, an effective global leadership requires the multilateral strengths in the political, economic and military aspects not to mention the setting of responsible moral and ethical examples. Only then will the nation not only be a power but a respected and respectable authority across the globe. The only country that fits the first bill is America and she is acting irresponsibly. The moral and ethical prizes go to the United Nations (not deservingly so, I have to confide) but it lacks the consensus of its members and the required military strengths.

It now remains to be seen whether this next election will yield a more multilateralist President who will begin to clean up the mess that the world is in now and start to consolidate American authority and rebuild American credibility, because at the moment the chances of America’s leadership apologising to the world and prosecuting the war criminal Bush-Cheney junta is unlikely. Until a responsible administration (if there has ever been one) takes the helm again and rolls back the American war machine in Iraq, investigates and not give mere lip service to the prison tortures and gives the Iraqi on the ground a good reason not to hate America, the rest of the world and especially Muslims and Arabs will look at it with disdain and never-ending suspicion. George W. Bush will never be a credible leader of a global authority and whether John Kerry will, that remains to be seen.

When set against the backdrop of past Presidents, the current occupant of the Oval Office seems to be a glitch in the drive towards the foundation of the much planned for new world order. With regards to past presidents (from George Bush I to JFK and from Ronald Reagan to FDR), whatever they wanted to do on the world stage they managed to obtain some form of world consensus i.e. other governments around the world agreed with them, supported them and endorsed them on the implementation of a particular policy. This new world order, the prophesied world government that many, many prominent people are talking and have talked about that is waiting to be established over the course of the next century, at this stage in its progression is now looking to be a union of international consensus, a union of international policy and a union of international engagement.

Unfortunately, though, due to the actions of the Bush administration along with the British and Australian governments the world is fragmented, as I said earlier, and there is not a union at the present time. However, is this a problem-reaction-solution situation, a necessary action and setback on the part of the Establishment using Bush as a scapegoat to force America upon the world in a last move to consolidate the Establishment’s needed power and foundation for the new world order and foreseen world government. After which, with the evident need for a morally responsible global authority we will have a revolutionary liberal occupation of the White House or the final rise in pre-eminence of the United Nations. These are only possible scenarios that we are faced with in the coming decades. There are, however, a number of irrefutable realities that are staring us in the face:

At the present moment in time, America is the world’s leading power; it is, however, not an authority except to its driven allies. Dominating the political landscape, it maintains major economic supremacy by many standards and its military is unsurpassed as the most powerful in history.
There is a long-term and laborious march towards some form of World Union/Government (terms can be misleading, but you get the picture), either through the hierarchical dominance of the United States, the supranational authority of the United Nations or some other world body of whose birth we are yet to witness.
The United States in turn is faced with three avenues:

In classic imperial fashion, accommodate as much as is feasibly possible the neo-conservative recommendations for American unilateral global dominance and refuse to allow for intellectual, international deliberation on world matters.
For the current dangerous policies of pre-emptive attack and relegating all concerns to the back seat bar the (illusory) security and interests of America and by extension the UK and Israel to give way to responsible global leadership with decisive actions that would regain credibility.
For America to yield its dominance to the United Nations and to lead an international effort to (possibly) restructure the world body into a more effective and decisive policy-making entity with the full backing and support of its member states.

No matter what happens, a couple of further things are clear and have resulted from this string of military actions on the part of the United States and also as a result of its foreign policy history:

Its international credibility is irreparably damaged.
The whole world will forevermore be suspicious of its true intentions and will have trouble believing anything that a future President might promise.
Due to its alliance with Israel, it has made itself the enemy of all Muslims everywhere regardless of whether the next president will be a Republican or a Democrat. The reason for this is that there has been, ever since the inception of Israel, an institutionalised leaning towards the Zionists resulting from their unrivalled lobbying clout.
The decisive victor in international politics is credible and approved multilateralist effort to deal with world problems. The world from now on, learning from its disastrous lessons with Gulf War II and the unilateralist actions of Bush and Co., will never proceed forward to engage any common enemy or worldwide problem without having collectively agreed upon a course of action and subsequently overseen by the United Nations. The United States is, today, alienated on one side with the rest of the world on the other.

The United Nations inadvertently has been pushed to the forefront of international diplomacy; with the publics boasting that, “see, when we went through the UN in 1991 and we won, we were victorious and everyone loved us. Now, going it alone, we are a dismal failure.”

The thing that interests me results from the following observations:

The neo-Aristocracy that comprises the international banking cartels and other powerful world groups steer the directions of both America and the UN (see my New World Order article). For example, Brzezinski wrote a book recently called ‘The Grand Chessboard’ in which he argued for American global dominance and how to go about it. Strange, since he is a well known globalist advocating for the dissolution of national sovereignty in favour of a new world order under a one world government. A one-time member of the Council on Foreign Relations, he is now trustee and counsellor to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a sister think tank to the Council that methodically promotes piecemeal internationalism within and without America.
They (the neo-Aristocracy) are all based in and work from within the United States.
The United States has gotten a raw deal out of them. Its economy is overstretched, its soldiers are being defeated on a daily basis and its political establishment have been made into the enemy of 21st Century Earth.

What I am interested is that set within the context of the plans for World Government sometime over the next century, and also the fact that America has been used against itself, in a sense, have we just seen a case of ‘using America to break America’ and therefore by default the masses, looking for worldwide responsible leadership, having been drawn into an indoctrinating process of accepting the concept of a world lead by one supranational authority with no ties to any particular nation and replacing the idea of nationalism with universalism. The US has failed, and the now the world looks to the UN for hope; indeed it has always been waiting in the wings for just such an opportunity, with a ready-made solution that would satisfy the world at the same time consolidating its own authority and power. Will the UN be the superpower of the 21 st Century and is the present chaos in the world simply a case of ‘tearing the house down to rebuild it anew? I, for one, believe that this is the case. The term itself, the ‘United’ Nations has an ominously similar connotation to the ‘United’ States. Psychology is the greatest factor in peoples’ acceptance of such an authority to rule over their affairs and such subtle terms and policies elsewhere will go a ways to encouraging the masses to be more receptive to the idea of a one-world government; James Warburg may get his wish by consent, after all.

One further objective that has, I believe, been accomplished is the consolidation of the world’s major resources and the geostrategic dominance of the lands from Eurasia to the Middle East in the hands of not the United States but the money interests behind the United States. So, while the world is pointing the finger of blame at America, the US-based international banking cartels get away clean with the oil prize and geographic control that will be important in the further rise of their new world order. If the United States eventually withdraws from the Middle East, which is quite likely given the due parallels with Vietnam, the only trusted body to administer the region will be the United Nations, being more than happy to add the Middle East to their list of lands that have been given into their care after crises are over.

The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union). Out of these troubled times a New World Order can merge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."

President George H. W. Bush, September 11, 1990.

A final point of deliberation that I would like the reader to consider is the timetable for the establishment of the waiting and final situation of World Government. In my New World Order article I predicted that other than a spontaneous unification of governments, economies and armies (which is likely to be resisted, despite its advantages) the elites will have to wait patiently for a long time, as they already have for centuries, in order to bring about international unification. There is, however, one other scenario of what the timetable for the new world order may comprise of. David Rockefeller of the wealthy and powerful American-based Rockefeller dynasty is the founder of the Trilateral Commission and honorary chairman of both the aforesaid and the Council on Foreign Relations, two globalist groups whose aims are to subvert American national sovereignty within a world wide political and economic system of governance. He has uttered the following words:

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

President Ronald Reagan said the following statement during the final years of the Cold War:

…In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask, is not an alien force already among us? What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?"

No one can doubt, that if there were an alien invasion tomorrow, the world would unite in an instant. All the people would unite against the common threat, spontaneously but receptively accepting the World Union/Government. The same theme runs through his statement and the statement of the power-wielding Rockefeller: rather than the slow and laborious march to world government, if a catalysing event or crisis were to present itself to the world, whether the crisis be real or contrived, all nations would accept and even beg for union. There are different global crises, indeed, existent today from global warming and AIDS to poverty and the Middle East crisis. Yet, none of these are immediate and world wide at the same time to bring about a major shift in international relations of the kind that gave rise to the bipolar world of the post-Second World War era. The threat of terrorism has, for one, been discredited as an excuse to justify American hegemony, which brings us to the catalysing events of September 11. The catalyst needed for American hegemony was a success and now there remains to be seen what catalyst on a global scale will we be faced with in order to bring about the hegemony of the international banking cartels and their allies under a one world government. Gleaning from Reagan’s speech to the United Nations, that catalyst seems to be all-out war, possibly a third world war, definitely a war big enough and horrific enough (unfortunately, the likelihood of a nuclear conflagration is quite probable in line with Brzezinski’s predictions in his ‘Out of Control’) to achieve the major international shift needed to reduce American might and to allow for the UN to take its place as the foremost and certified caretaker of the world.

As I have discussed in my New World Order article, this age-old plan is motivated by beliefs in the superiority of (I am well aware of the fact that this sounds like something out of ‘The Exorcist’, but please entertain this hypothesis and refer to my New World Order article, which you will find quite helpful on this topic) the Light-Bearing Lucifer and the inferiority of all other religions. Albert Pike, the great Masonic thinker in his outlining plans for the future of the world aimed to subjugate, primarily, Christianity and Islam due to their comprehensive systems of governance on the personal, spiritual, social, economic and political facets of human life. Pike outlined three world wars in a letter to fellow Mason Giusseppe Mazzini in a letter dated August 18, 1871 (see links below) with the first to promote Communism in order to weaken and balance West-based Christiandom, the second to promote Zionist ambitions for Palestine for the purposes of control of the Holy Land and, in particular, the Temple Mount and the third to destroy both Islam and Zionism to make way for the Masonic religion:

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Christianity, as the dominant force in Western civilisation has been removed in place of a thoroughly secular (and Freemasonry-compliant) outlook and Islam and the Muslim world is now being targeted through the media and through a direct economic and military threat, using the war on terrorism as a cover to quell any hope or attempt at a region-wide Islamic uprising and comeback. Islam is one of the chief remaining obstacles to a demonic plan that wishes to bring about the worldwide subservience of Lucifer, the god of the Freemasons. Iraq, the coming conflicts and the emerging new world order are just part of a wider plan to lead the world into a New Age religion headquartered in Jerusalem (the question of exactly who, in terms of a world leader, either on behalf of the UN or as the head of the UN itself, will be appointed or will take the reigns of the new global order is the subject of the third section to my New World Order article), with Zionism removed as the dominant force on the Temple Mount and Islam neutralised as an alternative way of life, and led by an eerily pagan United Nations:

"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation."

David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations.

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance."

President George H. W. Bush, addressing the General Assembly of the United Nations, February 1, 1992.

In conclusion, neo-conservatism is a globalist creation to wrest control of the world’s geostrategic prizes for its transnational masters; a means to an end just like Zionism. In the same way that extremist, secular Jews were taken advantage of to gain control of the Temple Mount from the Muslim Ottoman Empire in the form of Zionism, due to the Mount’s crucial significance in the Masonic religion, neo-conservatism is being utilised to stir the imperial inclinations of American primacy in making a final move to dominate as much of the world as possible through the control of natural resources and strategic land routes. As has happened time and again, I foresee that once American control has been consolidated, with the world crying foul the US will finally defer control of its many new military bases and conquered lands (Iraq, Afghanistan and in the future possibly Iran and Syria, not to mention the resulting influence on neighbouring countries) to a multilateral partnership overseen or run by a UN administration as is what happened in Kosovo after the Balkans War of the 1990’s. When Zionism is dead, Jerusalem will be renamed an “international city” administered by the “responsible” (Masonic) United Nations, having attained their age-old objective. Controlling both sides of the divide i.e. the UN and America/Zionism, they will have sacrificed the latter for their aims resulting in being openly known but welcomed by the world as a grand improvement on the neo-fascist ideology. Controlling both sides of the divide, they will have controlled the outcome: the age-old approach of divide-and-conquer, simple but very, very effective.

The other side of Pike’s third world war, Islam, is the last major obstacle to this Occult-led drive for World Government, being the last intact and credible monotheistic faith. As the fastest growing religion in the world and as a proven system of governance on all facets of life for fourteen hundred years, it represents a viable and proven alternative to the new world order that is based on hegemonic and demonic principles. The disunity of the Muslim world led to the break-up of the Muslim Ottoman Empire coupled with the Western assault on its lands; if that unity were ever to be regained and the successful and comprehensive orthodox interpretation of the Shar’iah were to be reinstated somewhere in the Muslim world then this would provide a potent force against any adversary as we have seen time and again in Islam’s history from the Battle of Badr to the Afghan-Russia war. Robert Ellwood, Comparative Religions Professor at UCLA, in his book ‘A History of Faith’ is of the opinion that all religions in the world are in the folkloric stage, except for Islam and feels that Islam is literally on the verge of its reformation period.

With the pristine preservation of the Islamic way and the increasing unity of the Muslims from America to Iraq and from Britain to Malaysia a powerful adversary is stirring to meet the challenge of the Masonic new world order. The masses would flock to a new Islamic authority (if not accept Islam altogether) like the one that provided safe haven for countless Jews and Christians under the Ottoman Empire thereby creating a great threat to the power and glory of the oppressive, capitalist and Masonically-controlled West. As a proven blessing to mankind, Islam, which produced the most progressive civilisation in the past two millennia on both the material and spiritual levels, has a rock solid foundation being built on conclusive acknowledgement of the presence of the Creator (Allah/God/Yahweh). This is why the Masonic and Western-based globalist interests will always be at odds with Islam since they recognise that the only thing preventing a return to Islamic Vice-Regency on Earth is the disunity of the Muslims and therefore globalist banking cartels will try everything to keep the Muslim world subject to their plans. A final conflagration, according to many observers, is in the offing to complete the ushering in of the much planned and painfully waited for world government. In my analysis, Zionism is doomed due to its bloody and despised history discredited, ridiculed and intellectually fought by knowledgeable observers from New York to Canberra and it remains to be seen now whether Islam will budge as the last remaining obstacle to the solidification of the new world order and the world wide establishment of an occultist religion.

Further Reading Material and Strongly Recommended

WebPages

Books